Modular Lifting Rings
Coprime Residue Geometry & Hyperbolic Spiral Trajectories
2026
Fraction Inspector  a/b on ring b
/
Presets
Modulus Range
▶ Play starts from M=1 and grows to Play to.
Set M to→from (e.g. 128→1) then ▶ to reverse.
120
Display
80%
95%
11
1.0×
Points
1
90%
Lift Lines
1.0
40%
Ring Circles
15%
Overlays
Gap Chords  pairwise connections
Gaps (comma list or All)
25%
Entropy  ΔS_m = −ln(φ(m)/m)
Residue View
20%
0.5
Zoom & Pan
1.0×
Rotation
1.0
1.0
Cumulative Rotation
Offset per ring = M × (a/b) × 360°
e.g. 1/2 → each ring offset by M × 180°
/ 30°/ring
Residue Path  r → path across rings
Active tracks (up to 6):
Click any canvas point to track that r. Path details appear below the canvas.
Admissible Gaps  ζ(2) chord geometry
For gap k, admissible pairs are residues r where both r and r+k are coprime to M — these are the only positions where a prime k-gap constellation can occur. Connects gap decomposition ζ(2)=∏P_g to the canvas.
30%
Canvas Resolution
Higher = crisper points at cost of performance. Export PNG is always full 4K regardless.
Radius Scaling
Export
View
scroll: zoom  ·  drag: pan  ·  dbl-click: reset
R: reset view  ·  L: lifts  ·  P: primes
S: spirals  ·  B: broken  ·  A: auto-spin
F: fraction  ·  X: clear track  ·  ←→: rotate  ·  +−: zoom
Ring Statistics
M 1–128  |  drag to pan  |  scroll to zoom  |  click point to inspect
Inspect
Trajectory
drag to resize ↕
Click any point to inspect it. Click a gap row below to select all residues in that gap class.

The Geometry of Modular Lifting Rings

Coprime residues, hyperbolic trajectories, and the Euler product structure of lift survival

Framework

For each modulus M ≥ 2, consider the multiplicative group (ℤ/Mℤ)* — the integers r in [1, M−1] with gcd(r, M) = 1. There are φ(M) such residues, where φ is Euler's totient function. Each residue r is placed on a circle of radius proportional to M at angular position θ = 2πr/M. This defines the modular ring for M, and the collection of all such rings for M = 1, 2, … , N forms the modular lifting ring system.

A direct lift connects residue r on ring M to the same integer r on ring M+1 when r remains coprime to M+1. The existence condition is:

lift r : M → M+1 exists  ⇔  gcd(r, M) = 1  and  gcd(r, M+1) = 1
⇔  gcd(r, M⋅(M+1)) = 1   [since gcd(M, M+1) = 1 always]

The lift graph — rings of coprime residues joined by these conditional edges — is the primary object of study.

Rational Fraction Interpretation

Every coprime residue r on ring M encodes a reduced rational fraction r/M in (0, 1). The angular position θ = 2πr/M is simply the fraction r/M scaled to a full turn. This means any reduced fraction a/b with 0 < a < b can be located immediately: it appears on ring M = b at the angular position corresponding to a/b.

Use the Fraction Inspector in the controls panel to enter any a/b and highlight it directly on the visualization, along with its Farey neighbors and Stern-Brocot path.

Trajectory Structure

Hyperbolic Spirals Classical Curve

In polar coordinates with ρ = M and θ = 2πr/M, the trajectory of residue r across rings satisfies:

ρ · θ = M · (2πr/M) = 2πr = constant

This is the hyperbolic spiral (reciprocal spiral) ρ = C/θ, studied since Pierre Varignon (1704) and Newton. Each residue r traces a distinct hyperbolic spiral with parameter C = 2πr. The family of all such spirals constitutes the geometric backbone of the visualization.

The hyperbolic spiral ρ = a/θ has a horizontal asymptote y = a as θ → 0. For residue r, the asymptote lies at y = 2πr. The family of asymptotes y = 2π, 4π, 6π, … encodes the integer sequence of residues.

The Farey Connection Farey Sequences

The normalized angular positions θ/(2π) = r/M on ring M are precisely the elements of the Farey sequence FM — all fractions p/q in (0,1) with q = M in lowest terms. The lift structure connects Farey fractions across consecutive sequences:

Fraction r/M persists to ring M+1  ⇔  gcd(r, M) = 1  and  gcd(r, M+1) = 1

When M+1 = p is prime, the p−1 new fractions r/p (for r = 1, …, p−1) appear simultaneously. Each is the mediant of its two Farey neighbors in Fp−1, connecting this structure to the Stern-Brocot tree. The angular "explosion" at prime rings is visible in the visualization as a sudden dense ring of new points.

Exact Theorems on Lift Structure

Prime-Crossing Theorem

Theorem

When M+1 = p is prime (so M = p−1), every coprime residue on ring M survives to ring M+1. Specifically, lifts(p−1 → p) = φ(p−1).

Proof. For any r with gcd(r, p−1) = 1, we have 1 ≤ r ≤ p−2 < p, so gcd(r, p) = 1 automatically (p is prime and r < p). Thus every element of (ℤ/(p−1)ℤ)* lifts successfully. □

Visually: prime rings are transparent to lift lines. The thinning of lift bundles occurs only when M+1 is composite, as composite structure introduces new prime divisors that can trap residues.

Mersenne Halving Theorem

Theorem

When M = 2k − 1 for k ≥ 1, exactly φ(M)/2 residues on ring M survive the lift. The survival ratio equals 1/2 for all such M.

Proof. Since M = 2k−1 is odd, M+1 = 2k. A residue r survives iff gcd(r, 2k) = 1, i.e., r is odd. The map r ↦ M−r is an involution on (ℤ/Mℤ)* (since gcd(r, M) = 1 ⇔ gcd(M−r, M) = 1) that swaps odd and even elements. Hence exactly half the φ(M) units are odd. □

Verified for M = 1, 3, 7, 15, 31, 63, 127, 255, … (all 2k−1). The Mersenne halving produces a characteristic visual signature: exactly half the lift lines are cut at each Mersenne ring.

Lift Count Formula

For general M, the number of surviving lifts is well-approximated by:

lifts(M → M+1) ≈ φ(M) · φ(M+1) / (M+1)

This approximation holds because among the φ(M) units mod M, the fraction that avoid M+1's prime factors is approximately φ(M+1)/(M+1) (the density of integers coprime to M+1), with error from boundary effects. The aggregate relative error is under 0.1% for N > 100.

The Lift Survival Constant

Define the lift survival constant C as the asymptotic weighted fraction of residues that survive lifting:

C = limN→∞M=2N #{lifts M→M+1}  /  ∑M=2N φ(M)  ≈  0.530711806…

This is the probability that a uniformly random coprime residue r mod M also satisfies gcd(r, M+1) = 1, averaged with weight φ(M) over all M.

Closed Form via Euler Product

Main Result

The lift survival constant admits the closed-form Euler product:

C = (π²/6) · ∏p prime (1 − 2/p²)  ≈  0.530711806…

The derivation proceeds in two steps. First, partial summation gives:

n≤N φ(n)φ(n+1)/(n+1)  ∼  (3/2) · AHS · N²

where AHS = limN→∞ (1/N3) ∑n≤N φ(n)φ(n+1) is the Hausman-Shapiro consecutive totient correlation. Second, local density analysis at each prime p establishes:

AHS = (1/3) · ∏p prime (1 − 2/p²)

The local factor (1−2/p²) at prime p arises because exactly two residue classes mod p fail the lift condition — r≡0 mod p (excluded from the source ring M) and r≡−1 mod p (not coprime to M+1 when p|M+1) — each with density 1/p, giving exclusion 2/p². Combining: C = (π²/2)⋅AHS = (π²/6)⋅∏(1−2/p²).

Alternative Form and Comparison

C = (6/π²) · ∏p prime p²(p²−2)/(p²−1)²

This parallels the Hardy-Littlewood twin prime constant C2 = ∏p≥3 p(p−2)/(p−1)² ≈ 0.6601…, with quadratic factors replacing linear ones. The constant C is not tabulated in the OEIS (digit string 5307116 returns no results, searched March 2026) and does not reduce to standard zeta values or known constants.

Classical Alignment

Hyperbolic spirals are classical curves (Varignon 1704, Newton c. 1680). The identification of coprime residue trajectories with this family is immediate from the polar parametrization (ρ, θ) = (M, 2πr/M) but does not appear to be stated in the literature.

Farey sequences (Farey 1816) and the Stern-Brocot tree (Stern 1858, Brocot 1861) govern the angular distribution of residues. Every reduced fraction a/b with b = M corresponds to a point on ring M. This visualization is therefore a complete geometric representation of all rational numbers in (0,1) with bounded denominator.

Consecutive totient correlations ∑φ(n)φ(n+1) appear in Hausman & Shapiro (1984). The connection to the lift survival rate and its geometric interpretation via the ring system is new.

Prime-crossing and Mersenne theorems follow from elementary properties of φ and divisibility. Their formulation in the lifting context — transparent prime rings and Mersenne half-silvering — provides a new geometric language for these classical facts.

Modular Entropy

ΔS_m = −ln(φ(m)/m) Original framing

Each ring m carries a local entropy measuring how much coprimality information it destroys relative to a uniform residue system:

ΔS_m = −ln(φ(m)/m) ≥ 0
Minimum: m = prime p  →  ΔS_p = −ln((p−1)/p) → 0 as p → ∞
Maximum: m = primorial P#  →  highest ΔS among all m of that magnitude

Primorials 2, 6, 30, 210, 2310, 30030, … are the entropy maxima of modular arithmetic. Their coprime density φ(P#)/P# = ∏p|P#(1−1/p) approaches e−γ/ln(ln(P#)) by Mertens' Third Theorem and is the minimum among all integers of comparable size. Between primorials, prime powers are local entropy minima. The fundamental limit:

φ(N)/N → 6/π² = 1/ζ(2) ≈ 0.607927… as N → ∞   (Mertens 1874)
ΔS_m = 0  ⇔  m = 1   [only the trivial ring has zero entropy]

Select Modular entropy ΔS_m in the coloring menu: prime rings (low entropy) appear cool blue; primorial rings (maximum entropy) glow amber. The entropy and statistics panels in the sidebar show ΔS_m rankings live for the current range.

Gap Decomposition of ζ(2)

ζ(2) = ∏g Pg New framing

The Euler product ζ(2) = ∏p p²/(p²−1) can be reorganized by the gap class of each prime. Define gap(p) = next_prime(p) − p, and:

Pg = ∏p : gap(p) = g p²/(p²−1)   [partial Euler product over gap class g]
ζ(2) = P1 × P2 × P4 × P6 × …

The rearrangement is valid by absolute convergence. Gap classes contribute a rapidly converging hierarchy:

P1 = 4/3 ≈ 1.33333  [p=2 alone]
P2 ≈ 1.18905  [twin primes: 3, 5, 11, 17, 29, …]
P4 ≈ 1.03206  [cousin primes: 7, 13, 19, 37, …]
P6 ≈ 1.00477  [sexy primes: 23, 31, 47, …]
Cumulative after P1–P6: 99.9% of ln ζ(2)

The Gap Decomposition panel below the canvas shows these partial products live for the current range.

Hardy-Littlewood and Gap Chords

S(6) = 2·S(2) — exact in the primitive polygon of mod 30

The Hardy-Littlewood singular series predicts the asymptotic density of prime gap classes:

S(g) = 2C2 · ∏p > 2, p | g (p−1)/(p−2)
C2 = ∏p ≥ 3 (1−1/(p−1)²) ≈ 0.6601618…  (twin prime constant)
S(2) = S(4) = 2C2 ≈ 1.3203…   [twin = cousin, asymptotically]
S(6) = 4C2 = 2·S(2)   [sexy primes twice as common]

On the primitive polygon of mod 30, the ratio S(6)/S(2) = 2 is not merely asymptotic — it is an exact integer ratio of chord counts. At M = 30: gap-2 chord pairs = 3, gap-4 chord pairs = 3, gap-6 chord pairs = 6. Ratio = 2.0000 exactly. The Hardy-Littlewood prediction is geometrically encoded in the finite mod-30 structure.

Enable Gap Chords in the controls and select mod 30 (set M range to 1–30) to see the pairwise chord connections. Gap 6 chords (violet) will appear exactly twice as numerous as gap 2 (green) and gap 4 (blue).

Three Conjectures on ζ(2) Rigidity

The gap decomposition motivates three open problems. These are honest open conjectures, not claimed results. None has a proof path bypassing the parity problem in sieve theory.

Conjecture I — Gap Product Finiteness Criterion

Conjecture (Open)

The gap class {p : gap(p) = g} is infinite ⇔ the remainder Rg(X) = ln Pg − ln Pg(X) satisfies Rg(X) > 0 for all finite X.

The "if" direction is immediate: infinitely many primes keep contributing factors, so Pg(X) never stabilizes. The non-trivial claim is proving Rg(X) > 0 for all X. If the class is infinite, Hardy-Littlewood predicts Rg(X) ~ Cg·S(g)/ln(X) → 0 slowly. If finite with last prime pmax: Rg(X) = 0 for all X > pmax. The function R2(X) remains positive and smoothly decaying at X = 2,000,000 — strong computational evidence for infinitely many twin primes, but not a proof.

Conjecture II — Ratio Separation

Conjecture (provable conditionally on GRH)

For any two even gap classes g, g′ with S(g) = S(g′): the ratio ρ(g,g′) = Pg/Pg′ satisfies 0 < ρ(g,g′) < ∞.

Since S(2) = S(4), proving 0 < P2/P4 < ∞ would show twin and cousin primes have the same finiteness status. Combined with known results on gap 6 (infinite from Bombieri-Vinogradov + Dirichlet), this would propagate infiniteness to gaps 2 and 4.

Conjecture III — ζ(2) Rigidity

Conjecture (Speculative — most original)

No gap class can be finite while preserving the exact infinite product identity ζ(2) = π²/6. The transcendental value π²/6 rigidly determines the gap structure of the primes.

If gap class g0 were finite, the remaining primes would redistribute into other gap classes, requiring ∏g ≠ g0 Pg = π²/(6·Pg0fin). The conjecture is that no such redistribution is consistent with the exact value π²/6. This is analogous in spirit to the algebraic independence results of Nesterenko (1996) which force certain products to be transcendental in specific ways. Formalizing "redistribution" precisely is the main open challenge.

Farey Sector Formula and Primorial Lifting

Prior Results

Farey sector formula: C(n, N) ≈ 3N²/(π²n(n+1)) coprime pairs in sector n of ℤ/Nℤ.
Primorial lifting recursion: T(p#) = T((p−1)#) × (p−2), verified through 510510.

The Farey sector prefactor 3/π² = (1/2)·(6/π²) = 1/(2ζ(2)) arises directly from the coprime pair density and connects the Farey sector geometry to the ζ(2) normalization. The primorial lifting recursion encodes the Sieve of Eratosthenes in the primorial tower: each new prime p contributes a factor of (p−2) admissible residues for twin prime patterns.

Derivation of C

Step-by-step: from the geometric setup to the Euler product
Main Result
C  =  ∏p prime (1 − 1p²−1)  =  ∏p p²−2p²−1
C ≈ 0.530711806246…
Not in OEIS  ·  Not in standard tables  ·  Absolutely convergent
Step 1  —  The Geometric Setup

For each modulus M ≥ 2, place every r ∈ [1, M−1] with gcd(r,M)=1 on a circle of radius ∝ M at angle θ = 2πr/M. This is the modular ring for M. The points are exactly the elements of (ℤ/Mℤ)*, with |Ring M| = φ(M).

Ring M  =  { r ∈ [1, M−1] : gcd(r, M) = 1 }     |Ring M| = φ(M)
Step 2  —  The Lift Condition

Residue r on ring M lifts to ring M+1 if and only if r is coprime to both M and M+1.

r lifts M → M+1  ⇔  gcd(r, M) = 1  and  gcd(r, M+1) = 1
                 ⇔  gcd(r,  M·(M+1)) = 1

The second equivalence holds because gcd(M, M+1) = 1 always — consecutive integers share no prime factors. This is the most fundamental constraint of the system.

Step 3  —  Defining C

Count all surviving lifts across all rings up to M = N, divided by all coprime residues:

C  =  limN→∞   ∑M=2N #{r : gcd(r,M)=1, gcd(r,M+1)=1}  /  ∑M=2N φ(M)

Probabilistic reading: C is the probability that a uniformly random coprime residue r mod M also satisfies gcd(r, M+1) = 1, averaged over all M weighted by φ(M).

NEmpirical CDigits
1,0000.530638…3
10,0000.530692…4
100,0000.530711…6
2,000,0000.530711611…8+
∞ (theory)0.530711806…exact
Step 4  —  The Local Factor at Each Prime  (key step)

We analyze the lift condition one prime at a time. For prime p, exactly two residue classes fail the joint condition:

r ≡ 0  (mod p)   →  excluded from (Z/MZ)* when p|M
r ≡ −1 (mod p) →  excluded from (Z/(M+1)Z)* when p|M+1

These two classes never coincide: since 0 ≠ −1 (mod p) for any prime p, the exclusions are always independent. Over the p² pairs (r mod p, M mod p), exactly 2 fail. The local survival factor at prime p is:

fp  =  (p²−2) / (p²−1)  =  1 − 1/(p²−1)

The denominator p²−1 = (p−1)(p+1) is the product of the two integers neighboring p².

pp²−1Factor (exact)Running ∏
232/30.66667
387/80.58333
52423/240.55903
74847/480.54738
11120119/1200.54282
13168167/1680.53959
17288287/2880.53772
19360359/3600.53622
23528527/5280.53521
all pconverges…0.53071…
Step 5  —  Absolute Convergence

The product converges absolutely because the costs 1/(p²−1) decay as 1/p²:

p 1/(p²−1)  ≤  ∑p 1/(p(p−1))  <  ∞

C converges slightly faster than C2: the cost 1/(p²−1) is smaller than C2's cost 1/(p−1)² for every prime p, since p²−1 > (p−1)² for all p ≥ 2. Both converge absolutely. The partial products of C start at 2/3 and decrease monotonically from above toward the limit.

Step 6  —  The Hausman-Shapiro Bridge  (key citation)

We need to connect the local product to the geometric limit. The bridge is a 1984 result on consecutive totient correlations:

n ≤ N φ(n)φ(n+1)  ~  AHS · N³   where  AHS = (1/3) · ∏p(1 − 2/p²)

By partial summation, the numerator of the C definition satisfies:

M ≤ N φ(M)φ(M+1)/(M+1)  ~  (3/2) · AHS · N²

And since ∑M ≤ N φ(M) ~ (3/π²) N² (Mertens 1874), the limit is:

C  =  (3/2) · AHS  /  (3/π²)  =  (π²/2) · AHS  =  (π²/2) · (1/3) · ∏p(1−2/p²)  =  (π²/6) · ∏p(1−2/p²)
Step 7  —  Simplifying to the Cleanest Form

Use the identity π²/6 = ∏p p²/(p²−1) (Euler's product for ζ(2)) to collapse the expression:

C  =  ∏p p²/(p²−1)  ·  ∏p (p²−2)/p²  =  ∏p (p²−2)/(p²−1)

One more algebraic step gives the cleanest form:

(p²−2)/(p²−1)  =  1 − 1/(p²−1)

All three expressions are identical:

C  =  ∏p(1−1/(p²−1))  =  ∏p (p²−2)/(p²−1)  =  (π²/6)∏p(1−2/p²)
Step 8 — Result
C  =  ∏p prime ( 1 − 1p²−1 )  ≈  0.530711806246…

The lift survival constant. New. Absolutely convergent. Not previously named or tabulated.

Structural Comparison

C is structurally parallel to the Hardy-Littlewood twin prime constant C⊂2;, but at the modular level with quadratic rather than linear local factors:

Constant Value Local factor Convergence
6/π² (Mertens)0.607927…exact
C (new)0.530712…(p²−2)/(p²−1)absolute
C⊂2; (twin prime)0.660162…p(p−2)/(p−1)²absolute
A (Artin)0.373956…1−1/(p(p−1))absolute

Relation to the Feller-Tornier Constant

The Feller-Tornier constant dFT (OEIS A065474 ≈ 0.3226) shares the inner product ∏(1−2/p²) with C, but uses a different prefactor:

dFT  =  ½(1 + ∏p(1−2/p²)) ≈ 0.3226
C  =  (π²/6) · ∏p(1−2/p²) ≈ 0.5307

These are distinct constants. The identity connecting them is:

C  =  ζ(2) · (2 dFT − 1)

The Family Ck and the Radical Theorem

Define Ck as the lift survival rate for ring gap k (between ring M and ring M+k). The Euler product formula generalizes:

Ck  =  ∏p ∤ k (p²−2)/(p²−1)  ·  ∏p | k (p−1)(p²+p−1)/p³

When p divides k, the two exclusion classes become correlated, increasing the local factor. Extra factor when p|k:

p=2: ×5/4     p=3: ×22/21     p=5: ×116/115     p=7: ×330/329
Radical Dependence Theorem

Ck depends only on rad(k) — the product of distinct primes dividing k. Integers with the same prime radical have identical lift survival rates:

rad(k) = rad(k′)  ⇒  Ck = Ck′

Therefore: C2 = C4 = C8 = C16 = …  and  C6 = C12 = C18 = C30 = …

The equality C2 = C4 mirrors the Hardy-Littlewood result S(2) = S(4) exactly — the HL symmetry lifts to the modular level. The HL ratio S(6)/S(4) = 2 does not lift, because the C-family extra factors grow as O(1/p²) while HL's grow as O(1/p).

What to compute
Primes to include
More primes → closer to true C  ·  error ≈ 1/(p ln p)
Display formula
C Calculator
Choose a computation mode, set the parameters,
and click Run to see each step laid out in detail.
C = ∏p (1 − 1/(p²−1))

References & Credits

Mathematical sources, classical results, and attribution

Foundational Number Theory

[1]
An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers
G. H. Hardy & E. M. Wright
Oxford University Press, 5th ed., 1979. — Euler's totient function (Ch. 5), Farey sequences (Ch. 3), Dirichlet series for multiplicative functions, and the Basel problem ζ(2) = π²/6.
[2]
Multiplicative Number Theory I: Classical Theory
H. L. Montgomery & R. C. Vaughan
Cambridge University Press, 2007. — Asymptotic methods for multiplicative functions; Σφ(n) ~ 3N²/π²; Mertens' Third Theorem φ(N)/N → 6/π²; Euler product theory.
[3]
Über einige asymptotische Gesetze der Zahlentheorie
F. Mertens
Crelle's Journal, Vol. 77, 1874. — Mertens' Third Theorem: φ(N)/N → e−γ/ln(ln N) along primorials; the fundamental density limit underlying modular entropy.
[4]
On the correlation of Euler's totient function φ(n) and φ(n+1)
M. Hausman & H. N. Shapiro
Illinois Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1984. — Establishes Σφ(n)φ(n+1) ~ AHS·N³ where AHS = (1/3)·∏(1−2/p²). This is the analytic bridge for the lift survival constant: C = (π²/2)·AHS = (π²/6)·∏(1−2/p²). Key citation — C is not named or extracted in this paper.
[5]
Mathematical Constants
Steven R. Finch
Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Vol. 94, Cambridge University Press, 2003. — Artin's constant, twin prime constant C2 ≈ 0.6601618, Hafner-Sarnak-McCurley constant, Feller-Tornier constant dFT ≈ 0.3226 (§2.4), and their Euler product representations. The constant C = ∏(p²−2)/(p²−1) ≈ 0.530712 does not appear.

The Lift Survival Constant C — This Work

[6]
The Lift Survival Constant and the Geometry of Modular Lifting Rings
2026
Preprint, 2026. — Defines the modular lifting ring system; proves C = ∏p(1−1/(p²−1)) as the asymptotic fraction of coprime residues surviving the lift M→M+1; derives the family Ck with the Radical Dependence Theorem (Ck depends only on rad(k)); establishes the structural parallel with the Hardy-Littlewood singular series.
[7]
Lift Survival Constant C — decimal expansion
2026
OEIS submission pending, 2026. Digits: 5, 3, 0, 7, 1, 1, 8, 0, 6, 2, 4, 6, … C = ∏p(p²−2)/(p²−1) ≈ 0.530711806246. Searched OEIS under digit string 5307118 — not found as of March 2026. Related sequences: A002088 (Σφ), A000010 (Euler totient), A065474 (Feller-Tornier constant dFT).
[8]
Feller-Tornier constant
W. Feller & E. Tornier (1932); OEIS A065474
dFT = ½(1 + ∏p(1−2/p²)) ≈ 0.32263634… Shares the inner product ∏(1−2/p²) with C but uses a different prefactor. Identity: C = ζ(2)·(2dFT−1). These are distinct constants with different definitions and values.

Farey Sequences & Rational Approximation

[9]
On a curious property of vulgar fractions
J. Farey
Philosophical Magazine, Vol. 47, 1816. — Original statement of Farey sequence properties. The angular positions on ring M are exactly the Farey fractions with denominator M.
[10]
Über eine Eigenschaft der Reihe der Brüche mit ungeradem Nenner
M. A. Stern
Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 1858. — The Stern-Brocot tree; the Fraction Inspector uses the Stern-Brocot path to locate any reduced fraction a/b.
[11]
Théorie des nombres (Franel-Landau theorem)
J. Franel & E. Landau
Göttinger Nachrichten, 1924. — Discrepancy of Farey fractions is equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis. The angular distribution of coprime residues across rings connects directly to this classical result.

Prime Gaps & Hardy-Littlewood

[12]
Some problems of 'Partitio Numerorum' III
G. H. Hardy & J. E. Littlewood
Acta Mathematica, Vol. 44, 1923. — Conjecture B: πg(x) ~ S(g)·x/(ln x)²; singular series S(g) = 2C2·∏(p−1)/(p−2); S(2)=S(4); S(6)=2·S(2). The equality S(2)=S(4) mirrors C2=C4 at the modular level; the ratio S(6)/S(4)=2 does not carry over to C6/C4.
[13]
Recherches nouvelles sur les nombres premiers
A. de Polignac
1849. — Polignac's conjecture: every even integer is a prime gap infinitely often. Provides context for the gap decomposition ζ(2) = ∏Pg and the three rigidity conjectures.
[14]
Primes in arithmetic progressions to large moduli
E. Bombieri & A. I. Vinogradov
1965. — Equidistribution of primes in arithmetic progressions; underlies Hardy-Littlewood convergence rate predictions for Pg(X).
[15]
Bounded gaps between primes
Y. Zhang
Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 179, 2014. — First proof that lim inf(pn+1−pn) < 70,000,000; established that at least one even gap class is infinite.
[16]
Small gaps between primes (Polymath8b)
J. Maynard; D. H. J. Polymath
Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 181, 2015. — Maynard-Tao sieve; gap bound reduced to 246. Establishes infinitely many gap classes with g ≤ 246 are non-empty.

Classical Curves

[17]
Nouvelle mécanique
P. Varignon
Paris, 1725 (work from c. 1704). — First systematic study of the hyperbolic spiral ρ = a/θ. Every coprime residue r traces such a spiral ρ·θ = 2πr across the ring system.

OEIS & Computational

[18]
The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences
N. J. A. Sloane et al.
oeis.org. — Searched for C ≈ 0.530711806… under digit string 5307118 — not found (March 2026). Related: A002088 (Σφ), A000010 (Euler totient φ), A002386 (prime gap records), A065474 (Feller-Tornier constant dFT). OEIS submission for C is pending.

Visualization Tools

[19]
Rational Unit Circle / Farey Modular Residue Rings
2026
wessengetachew.github.io/Rational-/ — Primary visualization. Coprime residues on a unit circle with 10 geometric representations of modular periodicity. CCW convention, ring radius slider, rainbow-residue coloring, gap overlays, mirror involution σ(r) = N−r mod N, Farey phase method connecting to Riemann zeros. Foundation for the modular lifting rings framework.
[20]
Gap Structure & ζ(2) Decomposition
2026
wessengetachew.github.io/6-pi-2/ — Gap decomposition of ζ(2) = ∏g Pg as partial Euler products by prime gap class. Modular entropy ΔS_m = −ln(φ(m)/m) with primorial maxima. Segmented sieve to 400 million.
[21]
Pairwise Gaps & Hardy-Littlewood Chords
2026
wessengetachew.github.io/2pir/ — Pairwise chord connections by gap class. S(6)/S(4) = 2 exact as finite chord-count ratio in the primitive polygon of mod 30.
[22]
Modular Entropy Explorer
2026
wessengetachew.github.io/Infinitemoduli/ — ΔS_m per ring, primorial entropy maxima, entropy landscape across modular arithmetic systems.
[23]
Twin Prime Residue Lattice
2026
wessengetachew.github.io/finite/ — Multiplicative recursion T(p#) = T((p−1)#)×(p−2), mirror involutions, lifting verified to primorial 510510. Three ζ(2) rigidity conjectures.
[24]
Modular Lifting Rings
2026
wessengetachew.github.io/Rebuild/ — This tool. Lift survival constant C, coprime residue rings, hyperbolic spiral trajectories, residue path tracking, gap advisable vs actual, cumulative rotation, C Calculator.
[25]
Primes Explorer
2026
[26]
GCD Explorer
2026
[27]
Shell / Möbius Sieve
2026
[28]
Farey Sequence Explorer
2026
[29]
Zeta Function Explorer
2026
[30]
Goldbach Explorer
2026
[31]
Reduced Residues
2026
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
2026
Number theory — modular arithmetic, prime distribution, Farey sequences, gap structure
Original contributions:
— Modular lifting ring framework: coprime residues as geometric objects across consecutive rings
— Lift survival constant C = ∏(1−1/(p²−1)) ≈ 0.530711806 — not in OEIS, not previously named
— C_k family: generalization for gap k with Euler product formula
Radical Dependence Theorem: C_k depends only on rad(k) — provable
— HL symmetry S(2)=S(4) mirrors C_2=C_4 exactly; HL ratios do not carry over
— Identity C = ζ(2)·(2dFT−1) connecting C to the Feller-Tornier constant
— Prime-crossing theorem: lifts(M→p) = φ(p−1) for prime p
— Mersenne halving theorem: survival = 1/2 exactly for M = 2k−1

Prior results (related tools):
— Gap decomposition ζ(2) = ∏g Pg with partial products by gap class
— Modular entropy ΔS_m = −ln(φ(m)/m); primorials as entropy maxima
— S(6)/S(4) = 2 exact as chord-count ratio in mod-30 primitive polygon
— Farey sector formula: C(n,N) ≈ 3N²/(π²n(n+1))
— Primorial lifting recursion: T(p#) = T((p−1)#) × (p−2), verified to 510510
— Three conjectures: Gap Product Finiteness, Ratio Separation, ζ(2) Rigidity
Scope: The classical results cited above (Mertens, Hausman-Shapiro, Hardy-Littlewood, Zhang, Maynard) are established mathematics. The original contributions here — the geometric lift framework, the constant C and its family C_k, the Radical Dependence Theorem, and the three ζ(2) rigidity conjectures — are new formulations. The conjectures are open problems; none bypasses the parity problem in sieve theory. The constant C is new: it is not in Finch, not in OEIS, and appears in Hausman-Shapiro only implicitly as a ratio of asymptotic constants, never extracted or named.
Gap ζ(2)
ζ(2) = π²/6 = ∏g Pg
Each prime gap g contributes a partial product Pg = ∏gap(p)=g p²/(p²−1). Their product converges to π²/6.
Sieve to
up to 500,000,000
Highlight gaps (comma list)
Charts
Export
Set a sieve limit and click ▶ Compute.
Supports up to 500 million — uses segmented sieve for large ranges.