PI

<!DOCTYPE html>

Polar vs Cartesian · Gap Analysis
Polar vs Cartesian
Wessen Getachew
f(θ) = 2 + sin(1θ) · sin(3θ / 32)
drag to rotate · shift+drag to pan
1.0×
rotation (degrees)
Space=Play · R=Rotate · F=Fullscreen · S=Screenshot · ↑↓=Zoom · ←→=Spin
f(θ) — Cartesian
click to probe
⟵ Wave Scrub ⟶ 0%
Gap Families — ζ(s)
Progress
0%
θ current
0
f(θ) now
f(θ) min
f(θ) max
f(θ) mean
Pts drawn
0
θ total
64π
Harmonics · Farey Intervals
Sound off
Sphere Color Mode off
Farey Intervals
1:1
q≤4
q≤16
q≤64
q>64
— Hz
— · —
Audio · sound is off
220 Hz
35%
Arnold Tongue · Warp
0.00
Gap Decomposition · ζ(s)
Statistics
Gap Ratio Analysis: Twin Prime Conjecture Evidence
Tracks Count(gap=2)/Count(gap=4) and other gap ratios. Hardy-Littlewood predicts twin primes (gap 2) and cousin primes (gap 4) have identical singular series constants, so their ratio should approach 1.0 as N→∞. Gap 6 (sexy primes) has a 2× larger constant due to the p=3 factor — so it is asymptotically twice as frequent as gap 2 or gap 4, not equal.
Gap Ratio Data
Metric Value Target Status Interpretation
Run Gap Decomposition to populate…
ζ Riemann Zeta · ζ(½+it) Critical Line
T = 50
N = 3000
Set Tmax and click Compute to draw ζ(½+it).